1 Chronicles 9:15

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And Bakbakkar, Heresh, and Galal, and Mattaniah the son of Micah, the son of Zichri, the son of Asaph;

Original Language Analysis

וּבַקְבַּקַּ֥ר And Bakbakkar H1230
וּבַקְבַּקַּ֥ר And Bakbakkar
Strong's: H1230
Word #: 1 of 10
bakbakkar, an israelite
חֶ֖רֶשׁ Heresh H2792
חֶ֖רֶשׁ Heresh
Strong's: H2792
Word #: 2 of 10
cheresh, a levite
וְגָלָ֑ל and Galal H1559
וְגָלָ֑ל and Galal
Strong's: H1559
Word #: 3 of 10
galal, the name of two israelites
וּמַתַּנְיָה֙ and Mattaniah H4983
וּמַתַּנְיָה֙ and Mattaniah
Strong's: H4983
Word #: 4 of 10
mattanjah, the name of ten israelites
בֶּן the son H1121
בֶּן the son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 5 of 10
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
מִיכָ֔א of Micah H4316
מִיכָ֔א of Micah
Strong's: H4316
Word #: 6 of 10
mica, the name of two israelites
בֶּן the son H1121
בֶּן the son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 7 of 10
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
זִכְרִ֖י of Zichri H2147
זִכְרִ֖י of Zichri
Strong's: H2147
Word #: 8 of 10
zicri, the name of twelve israelites
בֶּן the son H1121
בֶּן the son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 9 of 10
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
אָסָֽף׃ of Asaph H623
אָסָֽף׃ of Asaph
Strong's: H623
Word #: 10 of 10
asaph, the name of three israelites, and of the family of the first

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Post-exilic restoration community section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term שְׁאֵרִית (she'erit) - remnant is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God preserves faithful remnant.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Post-exilic returnees and Jerusalem's inhabitants. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection